Poetry comparison essay- ‘Poem’ and ‘Sonnet 19’ Essay

For my assignment I am loss to contrast two sonnets, written in early-mid 1590 and the second in 1990s, by popular poets William Shakespe be and Simon Armitage. I allow for be writing ab verboten(p) their content, meaning, social structure, agency, rhyme pattern, office, imaging, language and the tone set in each voice of writing and comparing how each characteristic is similar and different.In the early-mid 1590s, William Shakespeare wrote a sonnet, in his own style Shakespearean in the traditional context passion. It was vaguely called Sonnet 19, which suggests he is displaying that perhaps he was not completely connected, emotionally, with the sonnet. However, this fact could be contradicted in the g everyplacenment agency that all his sonnets were simply identified with a number, this particular one not being different.The sonnet itself is written as a quality it is meant to be perceived as coming from a character, by chance from one of his plays? It is active th e loved one of the soulfulnessa, age with date, and the narrator pleading to devouring Time (time, in this case, being classed as a noun) that He shouldnt age his loved one. In this ace, it is a traditional sonnet it is about love.Consisting of fourteen cable television services, and a structure of an octane, followed by a quatrane and then a couplet it is a typical Shakespearean sonnet.This poem has a rhyme scheme of ABAB, CDCD, EFEF for the get-go twelve lines of it, however for the final couplet a simple GG is employ kinda. This rhyme scheme gives a rhythm to the sonnet, and creates a less(prenominal) drastic and eerie atmosphere when class period beca intake the rhythm is more bouncy that that of a poem without the use of direct, full rhyme.Also, the iambic pentameter present in the sonnet gives out a more flowing beat when reading the poem. It also makes the sonnet front a little less dark and tense, as it releases ease for the readers. The ten syllables on each line are important to the poem, to increase flow and to maybe give the audience a little wittiness whether or not this was purposeful we dont know. But we do know Shakespeare mean to implicate ten syllables in each and every line of Sonnet 19.The first octane introducing the problem the persona is faced with in this case the fear that the one he loves will be negatively bear on by time. This tells the reader what the person the poem is directed from, is possibly quite shallow- due to the fact he pleads with Devouring Time not to carve with thy hours his loves fair brow. This means that he doesnt want time to have an effect on his loved ones appearance, which brings out a hint of arrogance from the writer.However, this point can be disregarded by the time the reader gets to the couplet at the conclusion of the text. The persona comes to the compromise that, even if time does eat away(predicate) at his loved one, the beauty and youth will exist forever in his writing his love shall in his verse ever live young.Referring back to the first eight lines of the sonnet, lots of imagery is used in the introduction. At first, the imagery creates slightly more stubborn and fierce images as if the persona is ordering Time to not touch his loved one. However, on the ninth line, O carve not with thy hours my loves fair brow gives the reader the impression that the persona is suddenly changing his attitude, and possibly realising the harder sense that was given off in the first octane. It paints an image of him almost begging, given the O set up as the opening to the line softens his tone sufficiently to create an imagery that puts the persona in a much less dominant place.Imagery in the first octane includes more angry phases, as he is almost demanding an answer for Times cruelty to the Earth, and to people and animals. This is shown through lines such as, Time plucks the keen dentition from the tigers jaws. This is saying that Time makes a tiger age, and therefore be dra wn to less youthful features loss of odontiasis, sufficiently less strength etc. But instead of saying this, a harsh image of nearbody ferociously pulling the set of a tigers teeth out is created to add the effect of anger which has overcome the persona.The text itself is about love- along with the majority of early(a) traditional sonnets. However, the poem is believed to be addressed to a man, however this doesnt indicate a pederastic relationship between the persona and the subject. It is believed that Shakespeare may have been gay, but it will never be know for sure and this is good one interpretation of his writing.The second sonnet I am going to compare is one of which by Simon Armitage and is called, yet again- vaguely, Poem. Already, a similarity is appearing between the two sonnets with skillful the name and the appearance of a poor connection between the poet and the actual piece of writing. The sonnet was written in the 1990s and so will be much newer than that of Sh akespeares, but there are in fact many similarities between the two, despite the time difference.Once again, the selfsame(prenominal) structure has been used first an octane, then a quatrane and a couplet to contain with. The eight lines and the last two serve the same purpose as the Sonnet 19 does to introduce, and the couplet to conclude. However, the quatrane between the two simply continues the first octane in more detail- introducing the situation.Within this structure, yet another pattern was used speaking in three lines about a positive part of the situation then including one negative fact, before returning to a lighter tone for three more lines.Also, the iambic pentameter is also used in this sonnet- and was likely to be purposeful to lighten the mood slightly, maybe to enhance the slight use of humour in some parts of the poem.However, the rhyme scheme ABAB CCCC DDDD and EE, also makes the text more rhythmic and upbeat. Although, because the rhymes are mainly just half-r hymes (not full ones) we cant be sure that the rhyme scheme was purposeful, and if they were, whether they were purposefully just half. half rhymes generally, if used in deliberate format, dampen any humour included in a piece. This is because rhymes ordinarily make it easier to read and more happy, or upbeat, but when reading Poem, you get a sense that a deliberate darkening to the mood was put into the text.The actual poem itself is not about love, foreign Sonnet 19 and many other traditional poems it is thought to be an obituary. It speaks about somebodys life, and also as if this person has passed away, or been removed from society. This also adds to the eerie feel, yet speaks of his life with a slightly humorous side.The imagery created in the positive lines of the poem develops a happier phase in this persons life in each stanza. Phrases such as, he praised his wife for every meal she make give off an impression he was a very kind man, and that he was also family-orientated. It tells us he was appreciative of others- showing a kinder, softer side to him.However, the fourth line of each phase cuts out the happier tone and surprises the reader with the fact that he one punched his wife in the face for laughing. This immediately develops a cold image of this man and the reader recognises that he had a dark side as swell up as a good one. It also makes him out to be a violent and possibly incontrollable man.The use of slang is present in this poem, joined by many other of Armitages pieces, in the way he uses the word slippered when describing the way he punished his daughter for lying. This is not proper slope and perhaps was deliberate to create a picture of this man being very common, down-to-earth and possibly just your everyday person.This constantly switching of imagery soon develops a balanced view in the readers mind that perhaps this man represents any normal person- for having both good and seriously inside us is in everybodys mannerisms.In the final couplet of this sonnet- which also includes a half-rhyme, instead of full- Armitage concludes the poem, saying the man the first twelve lines painted of was considered to be normal, and when people looked back at his time, their thoughts were sometimes he did this, sometimes he did that. This tells us that his moods changed, along with his attitude and that he did both good and cock-a-hoop in his time.The way the final couplet concludes is the same as Shakespeares finale and they both end the poem in a generally lighter tone.I believe that the two sonnets compared in my coursework are very similar, despite the change in times. Poetry clearly will not differ over time, and the similarities between the two indicate that sonnets- if kept traditional- will always be very similar.